💰 Chance of losing 10 BJ hands in a row - Other Gambling Games Forum - Discuss Other Gambling Games

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🍒

Filter:
Sort:
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

If you're a strong “basic strategy” player (i.e. you don't do stupid things like hit 15 against a dealer's 6, or split 10s, etc.) you will win about 43% of your hands.


Enjoy!
Blackjack - Betting Systems - Wizard of Odds
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
Does blackjack card counting really work? Part 1

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

benzinmusic.ru › probability-of-losingblackj.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
Progressive Betting at Blackjack: Does it Work?

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

benzinmusic.ru › › General Blackjack Forum.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
DEVASTATING BLACKJACK LOSS! WORST SESSION YET WITH STEVE! (HUGE RAGE)

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

What are the odds of losing nine hands in a row, playing correct basic stratigy? of playing blackjack, you should have one losing streak of 10 hands or more.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
Sodapoppin loses 17.5K$ in blackjack on stream!!!!!!

🤑

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

The Wizard of Odds answers readers' questions about Blackjack. For example, if I have five cards that total 15 against a dealer's 10, am I pressing my When I said the probability of losing 8 hands in a row is 1 in I meant that starting.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
Xposed Blackjack Rages and Losses

🤑

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Let's say you played hours of blackjack this year and you just had your first hand losing streak. Well you played at least hands, and.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
I almost lost $3200 using martingale betting system in blackjack. So risky...

🤑

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

10, where the 16 is composed of 3 or more cards, in general the odds favor standing. I play the I wanted to what the odds are of losing 4,5,6,7,8,9 hands in a row? Ignoring ties the probability of a new loss for a hand of blackjack is %.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
HOW TO LOSE $3000 IN 10 MINUTES OF BLACKJACK AND SLOTS! WITH LIVE DEALER!

🤑

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

If you're a strong “basic strategy” player (i.e. you don't do stupid things like hit 15 against a dealer's 6, or split 10s, etc.) you will win about 43% of your hands.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
Losing entire life savings in less than 10 minutes playing blackjack

🤑

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Let's say you played hours of blackjack this year and you just had your first hand losing streak. Well you played at least hands, and.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
Boost Your Blackjack Odds

🤑

Software - MORE
G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

10, where the 16 is composed of 3 or more cards, in general the odds favor standing. I play the I wanted to what the odds are of losing 4,5,6,7,8,9 hands in a row? Ignoring ties the probability of a new loss for a hand of blackjack is %.


Enjoy!
Valid for casinos
Visits
Likes
Dislikes
Comments
INSANE BLACKJACK COMEBACK (7 WINS IN A ROW)

Blackjack tournaments are not my strong subject. When I said the probability of losing 8 hands in a row is 1 in I meant that starting with the next hand the probability of losing 8 in a row is 1 in The chances of 8 losses in a row over a session are greater the longer the session. Featured Games. Card counters are an exception to the simple no, they may play multiple hands to draw more cards out of a deck rich in good cards, thus improving their odds. These appendices show that the more cards that are in your hand the more inclined you should be to stand. In blackjack , do you improve your chances by playing two hands at once for x each, versus 1 hand at a time for 2x? I know, I know, its some sort of divine intervention betting system I am talking about and no betting system affects the house edge. What is important is that you play your cards right. The Wizard of Odds. In other words, a benefit of losing is that it tends to make the count better. Everything I have to say about money management can be summarized by the following two rules 1 don't gamble with money you can't afford to lose, and 2 don't gamble if it isn't fun. That column seemed to put the mathematics to that "feeling" a player can get. I appreciate the thought of visiting the advertisers. Jim from Atlanta. Ignoring ties the probability of a new loss for a hand of blackjack is So the probability of losing 8 in a row is. Yet it does go to show that if you must use a betting system one that increases the bet after a loss is better than one that increases after a win. If the odds are better, how much better? In somebody accepted my betting system challenge, claiming he could beat blackjack without counting. I hope this answers your question. More Info Got It! So unless you might actually play there is no pressure any longer to click through the banners. Share this. The details are in my page on the Daniel Rainsong challenge. Would you look into it for us, the gullible public? Is it that when I sit down at the table, 1 out of my next playing sessions I can expect to have an 8 hand losing streak? Your expected loss of this play is 0. As I always say all betting systems are equally worthless so flying by the seat of your pants is just as good as flat betting over the long term. Enter your email address below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter along with other special announcements from The Wizard of Odds! In the long run you will lose the same percentage of money bet no matter what system you use. After I posted it, I received a message from a blackjack genius, who goes by the handle "Cacarulo. Two questions, you said in a previous answer that you don't cap your winnings.{/INSERTKEYS}{/PARAGRAPH} So my advice is use a system that maximizes the fun of the game. I have also seen tables that with cameras can track every bet and every play each player makes. Consider what would happen if you alternated between a win and a loss the entire session. The reason is that losing is positively correlated to small cards being played, and winning to large cards. Unless you are counting cards you have the free will to bet as much as you want. I don't put a lot of emphasis on betting systems. Usually the fun ends when I have lost too much or have played too long. I tend to think that he would have bet the minimum most of the time, except if it was late in the shoe, and the ratio of losses to wins was very high since the last shuffle, he would have bet the maximum. Note that in both of these situations either two fives or two sixes have left the deck which are the two most helpful cards for the player. The book gets into much more detail. The Wizard of Odds Search. The betting system will not affect the expected loss, but will affect the volatility. Jackblack from New Jersey. Wong says that if you are behind to bet opposite of the leader, small when he bets big, and big when he bets small. The simple answer is no, it neither helps you nor hurts you. However I'm deeply skeptical of anything that claims to "blow old fashioned card counting away. It claims not to be a counting system, yet the vague description of the system that the website gives makes it sound like counting to me. However, you will have less bankroll variance by betting two hands of x as opposed to one of 2x. If you are in the lead then you should bet with the second highest player. I've even taken your blackjack data and made it into a full-color pocket-sized page that I carry in my briefcase for those unexpected trips to Vegas. However progressive systems will turn a choppy neutral session into a bad one. Keep in mind this is just what works for me. The results always approach the house edge in the long-term. However, this is a weak correlation. Steve from Phoenix, AZ. The two situations where you should be the most inclined to stand if you have a multiple card hand are 16 against a 10 and a 12 against a 3. The fewer the decks the more this is true. My challenge allowed the player a bet range of 1 to 1,, which is probably enough to overcome the house edge, but it will be hard to find a real casino okay with a jump in bet size by a factor of 1, The short answer to your question is, no, tracking wins and losses will not help enough to warrant the bother of doing it. Besides every once in awhile throwing down a bigger bet just adds to the excitement and for some reason it seems logical that if you have lost a string of hands you are "due" for a win. About video blackjack, that may be the way of the future. {PARAGRAPH}{INSERTKEYS}I had a look at the web site and also found what little he says about the theory behind his system makes it sound like card counting. Any tips on money management in blackjack? This would make the remaining deck more large card rich and thus lower the house edge. Thanks for the kind words. The claims are pretty out-there: "Win every time" etc. I have said numerous times that there is no long-term way to beat a game with a house edge. These tables look and feel like any other blackjack table, so you card counters may be out of business if these tables are successful. Speaking of supporting my site, it helps to click through my Amazon links when buying books there. This just goes to show that you should always have double or split money available if you need it. Regarding your second question, there is something to be said about the composition of a hand. Michael G. Furthermore, the player who puts a conservative cap on their winnings is never going to experience the fun of a long hot winning streak. I have no problem with increasing your bet when you get a lucky feeling. Enter your email address to receive our newsletter and other special announcements. Progressive betting systems, like yours, will turn a good session into a great one without the risk of catastrophic loss as with regressive systems like the Martingale. You should do what you are comfortable with. It is not just computer simulations that back this up but the fundamental laws of probability. I usually do pretty well, but it's slow and steady and not very exciting. Thank for the compliment and I'm happy to help your bankroll last longer. The name for this system is the Martingale. Or does it mean that on any given loss it is a 1 in chance that it was the first of 8 losses coming my way? I've memorized and follow your rules and generally do well but of course there are times when I lose. When I gamble for fun I keep playing until it isn't fun any longer. I usually double after a win, go back to my original bet after three wins or any loss , and play the game according to the book. However I speculate this is an extremely small effect. I hesitate to put this in writing at all because again the effect is probably very small and I fear system sellers will misquote me and imply I endorse any system, which I DO NOT. My blackjack appendix 3A and appendix 3B show the exceptions to single- and double-deck blackjack, based on the composition of the hand. Love your site. Any tips? Without knowing anything else, if you lost the last hand in blackjack then it is slightly more likely that more small cards than large just left the deck. I have seen fully electronic tables with video display at the World Gaming Expo. My question though is what does that really mean? Knowing how knowledgeable he is about blackjack, I felt that he was probably right, so I declined the challenge. With the ups and downs of blackjack it takes hundreds of hours before regression toward the mean will cause actual results to look like expected results. This enables the house to accurately comp players and alert them to card counters.